United States Court of Federal Claims, 2018

Holloway v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Holloway v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided February 23, 2018 · Herbrina Sanders
Holloway v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: January 17, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JESSIE M. HOLLOWAY, * No. 16-919V * Petitioner, * Special Master Sanders * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; Reasonable AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Amount Requested. * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Sean F. Greenwood, The Greenwood Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Robert P. Coleman, III, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION1 On August 2, 2016, Jessie M. Holloway (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Program”).2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2012). Petitioner alleged that she suffered from pneumonitis and respiratory problems as a result of a Prevnar 13 vaccine administered on December 17, 2015. Pet. 1, ECF No. 1. On October 30, 2017, the undersigned dismissed Petitioner’s claim following a motion for a dismissal decision. Decision, ECF No. 38.

On December 18, 2017, Petitioners filed an application for attorneys’ fees and costs.

ECF No. 41. Petitioner requested $22,252.50 in attorneys’ fees and $3,247.61 in costs, for a total of $25,500.11. Id. at 1. Respondent submitted a Response to Petitioners’ motion on December 22, 2017. ECF No. 42. Respondent indicated that “[t]o the extent that the Special Master is treating [P]etitioner’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs as a motion that requires a This decision shall be posted on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.

Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). response from [R]espondent[,] . . . Respondent is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case.” Id. at 2. Respondent recommended that the undersigned exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees and costs. Id. at 3. Petitioner did not submit a Reply.

The undersigned has reviewed the detailed records of time and expenses of Petitioner’s counsel, and finds that they are reasonable. In accordance with the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e) (2012), the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to attorneys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount of $25,500.11,3 in the form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Sean F. Greenwood, of The Greenwood Law Firm. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Herbrina D. Sanders Herbrina D. Sanders Special Master

This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.