Bratcher v. United States
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims ) MICHAEL A. and TINA C. BRATCHER, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 15-986L ) (Filed: June 18, 2018) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) )
ORDER Plaintiffs have advised the Court that the parties have reached a settlement regarding interest damages. ECF No. 125. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 58, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiffs as set forth in the table below.
Claim Total Interest Per Diem Interest Owner No. through 2/24/18 After 2/24/18 1a William Payne $1,996.14 $1.03 1b William Payne $2,063.13 $1.06 2 Kenneth and Henryetta Payne $3,772.97 $1.94 3a, 3b David and Malia Emerson $156.25 $0.08 4 Drew Emerson $817.90 $0.42 12 King Revocable Trust $1,592.93 $0.82 13 Stephenson Revocable Trust $366.24 $0.19 14a James Scott $987.20 $0.51 14b James Scott $1,087.22 $0.56 15 Flint and Connie Neece $3,305.77 $1.70 16 Lori Locke $2,196.19 $1.13 17 David and Doreen Hasenbeck $1,037.21 $0.53 18 Simnitt Family Trust $674.08 $0.35
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Elaine D. Kaplan ELAINE D. KAPLAN Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.