Prazoff v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-0634V Filed: June 5, 2018 UNPUBLISHED

MARK PRAZOFF, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Petitioner, Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v. Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent.

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Althea Walker Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On May 15, 2017, Mark Prazoff (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of pneumococcal and tetanus vaccines he received on April 5, 2016. Petition at preamble. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 2, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On June 5, 2018, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $52,206.94. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $52,206.94, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Mark Prazoff. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS MARK PRAZOFF, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 17-634V ) Chief Special Master v. ) Nora Beth Dorsey ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On May 15, 2017, Mark Prazoff (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended. Respondent conceded petitioner’s entitlement to compensation in his Rule 4(c) Report filed on February 2, 2018. Based on Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report, on that same day, the Chief Special Master found petitioner entitled to compensation.

I. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $52,206.94, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $52,206.94, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1 Petitioner agrees.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Althea Walker Davis ALTHEA WALKER DAVIS Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-0515 DATED: 5 June 2018

Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.