United States Court of Federal Claims, 2018

Coulter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Coulter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided October 17, 2018 · Nora Beth Dorsey
Coulter v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1376V Filed: July 24, 2018 UNPUBLISHED

NATHAN COULTER, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Petitioner, Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine SECRETARY OF HEALTH Administration (SIRVA) AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Ann Mayhew Golski, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Ilene Clair Albala, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On September 28, 2017, Nathan Coulter (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered right shoulder injuries as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on October 16, 2016. Petition at 1-2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 23, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.

Specifically, respondent states that “the bursitis petitioner suffered is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (‘SIRVA’), a Table injury, following

Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

administration of the flu vaccine he received on October 16, 2016.” Id. at 5.

Respondent further agrees that “[b]ased on the medical records outlined above, petitioner met the statutory requirements by suffering the condition for more than six months. Therefore, based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 5-6.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.