United States Court of Federal Claims, 2018

Van Keuren v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Van Keuren v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided October 25, 2018 · Christian J. Moran
Van Keuren v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ******************** * The Estate of ROBERT WILLIAM * VAN KEUREN, Decedent, by and * through ROBERT HAMMIE VAN * KEUREN and SALLY VAN * KEUREN, as co-Personal * Representatives, * No. 17-636V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: September 27, 2018 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; flu vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”). * * Respondent. * ******************** * Diana Stadelnikas, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner; Alexis B. Babcock, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1 On September 26, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed on May 15, 2017 by Robert Hammie Van Keuren and Sally Van Keuren, as co-Personal Representatives of the estate of Robert William Van Keuren. Petitioners alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine Mr. Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material before posting the decision.

Van Keuren received on February 29, 2016, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused him to suffer Guillain- Barré syndrome (GBS) and ultimately resulted in his death. Petitioners represent that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on Mr. Van Keuren’s behalf as a result of his injury and / or death.

Respondent denies that the vaccine either caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged GBS or any other injury or his death.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include: A lump sum payment of $160,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 17-636V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.