Littrell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: October 31, 2018
***************************** SHARON LITTRELL, as Personal Representative * No. 17-796V of the Estate of VALENA YVONNE CAHILL, * deceased, *
*
Petitioner, * Special Master Sanders
*
v. *
* Stipulation for Award; Influenza SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“flu”) Vaccine; Guillain-Barré AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Syndrome (“GBS”); Death
*
Respondent. *
***************************** Joseph Alexander Vuckovich, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, for Petitioner. Robert Paul Coleman, III, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
DECISION1
On June 14, 2017, Leo Cahill (“Mr. Cahill”) filed a petition for compensation pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program as Personal Representative of the Estate of Valena Yvonne Cahill (“Ms. Cahill”), deceased.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2012). While the petition was pending, Sharon Littrell (“Petitioner”) replaced Mr. Cahill as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ms. Cahill upon Mr. Cahill’s death.3 The petition alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine Ms. Cahill received on December 3, 2015, caused her to suffer from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”), which resulted in her death. See Stip. at 2, ECF No. 33.
On October 31, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to Petitioner. Id. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused Petitioner’s alleged GBS and death. Id. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
A lump sum of $120,000.00 in the form of a check payable to [P]etitioner as Legal Representative of the Estate of Valena Yvonne Cahill. This amount represents compensation for all remaining damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.4
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Herbrina D. Sanders Herbrina D. Sanders Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.