United States Court of Federal Claims, 2019

Scutt v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided April 9, 2019 · Laura D. Millman

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1599V Filed: March 15, 2019 Not to be Published ************************************* MARIE SCUTT, * * Petitioner, * Damages decision based on * stipulation; influenza (“flu”) v. * vaccine; Transverse myelitis * (“TM”) SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ************************************* David B. Turret, New York, NY, for petitioner.

Daniel A. Principato, Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On March 15, 2019, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that she suffered transverse myelitis as a result of her receipt of influenza (“flu”) vaccine on December 6, 2014. She further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer transverse myelitis or any other injury. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.

The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of $215,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2019 /s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall delete such material from public access. 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.