United States Court of Federal Claims, 2019

Sanchez-Aldana v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided May 1, 2019 · Brian H. Corcoran

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1879V (not to be published)

************************* ANDREW SANCHEZ-ALDANA and * KARINA SANCHEZ-ALDANA, * on behalf of V.S.A., a minor, *

* Special Master Corcoran *

Petitioners, * Filed: April 5, 2019

* v. *

* Decision by Stipulation; Intussusception; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Rotavirus Vaccine. AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

* ************************* John R. Howie, Howie Law, P.C., Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Althea W. Davis, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON STIPULATION1

On December 5, 2017, Andrew and Karina Sanchez-Aldana filed a petition on behalf of their minor child, V.S.A., seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 ECF No. 1. Petitioners alleged that V.S.A. suffered from intussusception as a result of the rotavirus vaccine she received on December 5, 2014. Id. at 1, 3. In April 2018, the parties began engaging in settlement negotiations. See Mot. to Suspend Deadline for Rule 4(c) Report at 1, filed Apr. 26, 2018 (ECF No. 10). While Respondent maintains that the rotavirus vaccine did not cause V.S.A.’s injury, the parties filed a stipulation on April 5, 2019. See Stip. at 1–2 (ECF No. 21).

Based upon my own review of the record, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation (as attached hereto) is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards: • A lump sum of $4,633.15, in the form of a check payable to Petitioners; and • An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract as described in Paragraphs 9–10 of the parties’ stipulation (as attached hereto).

Stip. at 2. This amount represents compensation for all damages under Section 15(a) of the Act to which Petitioners are entitled.

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Special Master

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available online in its present form. Id. 2 The Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3758, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 through 34 (2012) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by each filing (either jointly or separately) a notice renouncing their right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.