United States Court of Federal Claims, 2019

Wilt v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided September 17, 2019 · Nora Beth Dorsey

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-446V Filed: April 19, 2019 UNPUBLISHED

VIRGINIA WILT,

Petitioner, Special Processing Unit (SPU); v. Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Causation-In-Fact; Influenza (Flu) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to HUMAN SERVICES, Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Respondent.

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On March 26, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a right shoulder injury as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on September 20, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 15, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that the Division of Injury Compensation Programs, Department of Health and Human Services “has reviewed the facts of this case and concluded that petitioner’s right shoulder subdeltoid bursitis and associated pain was more likely than not caused by the September 20, 2016, flu vaccination.” Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that “the records show that the case was timely filed, that the vaccine was received in the United States, and that petitioner satisfies the statutory severity requirement by suffering the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than six months after vaccine administration.” Id. (citing 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa- 11(c)(1)(D)(i)).

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.