Kapp v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION SEP 30 2019 OSM U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ]n tbe Wniteb ~tates <!Court of jfeberal <!Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1128V Filed: September 4, 2019 ************* * DOROTHY J. KAPP, * * Dismissal; Pneumococcal conjugate Petitioner, * vaccine; Atrial fibrillation * v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * ************* * Dorothy J. Kapp, pro se, Louisville, KY Daniel Principato, Esq., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.
DECISION 1 Roth, Special Master: On August 1, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for Vaccine Compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ("the Program"),2 alleging that a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine caused her to develop atrial fibrillation and other adverse effects. On July 9, 2019, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss based on the record. In response, petitioner submitted a request via email that her case be dismissed.
Although this Decision has been formally designated " unpublished," it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims's website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. I07- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 29 13 ( codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision's inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule l 8(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction "of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or s imilar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy." Vaccine Rule l 8(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id. 2The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (hereinafter "Vaccine Act" or "the Act"). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act.
To receive compensation under the Program, petitioner must prove either 1) that she suffered a "Table Injury" - i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table - corresponding to her vaccination, or 2) that she suffered an injury that was actually caused by a vaccine. See §§ 13(a)(l)(A) and 1 l (c)(l). An examination of the record did not uncover any evidence that petitioner suffered a "Table Injury." Further, the record does not contain persuasive evidence indicating that petitioner's alleged injury was vaccine-caused or in any way vaccine-related.
Under the Act, petitioner may not be given a Program award based solely on the petitioner's claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by either medical records or by the opinion of a competent physician. § l 3(a)(l ). In this case, because there are insufficient medical records supporting petitioner's claim, a medical opinion must be offered in support. Petitioner, however, has offered no such opinion that supports a finding of entitlement.
Accordingly, it is clear from the record in this case that petitioner has failed to demonstrate either that she suffered a "Table Injury" or that her injuries were "actually caused" by a vaccination. Thus, this case is dismissed for insufficient proof. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.
The Clerk's Office is directed to send this Decision to Ms. Kapp at the following address via certified and regular mail.
Dorothy Kapp 7609 Charron Road Louisville, KY 40220 IT IS SO ORDERED.
~w?)e,<N?M Date ~ , 2...0t l.\ •"IDA ,f}_- cCbu- I~, MindyfMichaels Roth Special Master
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.