United States Court of Federal Claims, 2019

Spiering v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Spiering v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided October 21, 2019 · Nora Beth Dorsey
Spiering v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-0577V Filed: July 12, 2019 UNPUBLISHED

LAURA M. FORCELLA SPIERING, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent.

Richard H. Moeller, Moore, Heffernan, et al., Sioux City, IA, for petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On April 20, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he received an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on November 2, 2016, and subsequently suffered a shoulder injury as a result of the flu vaccination (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 12, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for her shoulder injury On June 28, 2019, respondent filed a combined Rule 4 report/proffer on award of compensation (“Rule 4/Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $141,975.85 (comprised of $135,000.00 for pain and suffering, $4,536.87 for past lost earnings, and $2,438.98 for unreimbursable expenses). Rule 4/Proffer at 5. In the Rule 4/Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.

This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Rule 4/Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Rule 4/Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $141,975.85 (comprised of $135,000.00 for pain and suffering, $4,536.87 for past lost earnings, and $2,438.98 for unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Laura M. Forcella Spiering.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.