United States Court of Federal Claims, 2019

Gold v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Gold v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided October 28, 2019 · Mindy Michaels Roth
Gold v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1445V Filed: October 2, 2019

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TAMMY S. GOLD, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * v. * Order Concluding Proceedings; Influenza * (“Flu”) Vaccine; Guillain-Barre Syndrome SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“GBS”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * D. Chadd McKitrick, Esq., Dublin, OH, for petitioner.

Ida Nassar, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1 Roth, Special Master: On September 25, 2019, petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in the above- captioned case. ECF No. 24. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.