United States Court of Federal Claims, 2019

Capasso v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Capasso v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided December 30, 2019 · Brian H. Corcoran
Capasso v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-0014 V (not to be published)

ANTHONY CAPASSO, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: November 15, 2019

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Special Processing Unit (SPU); HUMAN SERVICES, Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Respondent.

Shealene Priscilla Mancuso, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Daniel Anthony Principato, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS1 On January 4, 2017, Anthony Capasso (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa–10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “Program”), alleging that as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on November 14, 2015, he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) to his left shoulder. (Petition at 1). On July 10, 2019, a decision was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner in the amount of $75,190.0. (ECF No. 45.)

1I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated October 24, 2019, (ECF No. 49), requesting a total award of $26,255.53 (representing $25,833.70 in fees and $421.83 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9, Petitioner’s counsel represents that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (Id. at 2.) Respondent did not file a response thereafter.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. § 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I award a total of $26,255.53 (representing $25,833.70 in fees and $421.83 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and counsel, Shealene Priscilla Mancuso, Esq. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.