Acosta v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ************************* ISABELLA ACOSTA, * * No. 19-1050V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * * Filed: September 9, 2020 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * ************************* ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1 On September 8, 2020, petitioner moved for voluntary dismissal under Vaccine Rule 21(a). Petitioner submitted a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties in accordance with Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(B).
Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master
The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website (http://www.cofc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7). Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.