United States Court of Federal Claims, 2020

Robare v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Robare v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided November 18, 2020 · Brian H. Corcoran
Robare v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-0247V UNPUBLISHED

ROBIN ROBARE, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 19, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Influenza HUMAN SERVICES, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SIRVA); Tissue Necrosis

Michael David Bell, Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneault & Schaffer Co., LPA, Toledo, OH, for petitioner.

Mark Kim Hellie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On February 16, 2018, Robin Robare filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury, with soreness in her right deltoid muscle, which led to limited range of motion, necrosis, and atrophy of the right deltoid muscle, which was caused in fact by an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 27, 2015. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at October 16, 2020, ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered within the United States, she experienced the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her alleged injuries. Petition at 1, 4; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner

Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). developed tissue necrosis or any other injury as a result of receiving the flu vaccine.”

Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on October 16, 2020, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $40,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.