United States Court of Federal Claims, 2020

Collins, Jr. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided November 30, 2020 · Thomas L. Gowen

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: November 6, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * * *

KENNETH LEROY COLLINS, JR., * UNPUBLISHED *

Petitioner, * No. 20-84V * v. * Special Master Gowen *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Order Concluding Proceedings; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Vaccine Rule 21(a). *

Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nichole G. Booker, Mast Law Firm, Smithfield, NC, for petitioner.

Camille M. Collett, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1 On November 6, 2020, petitioner filed notice of his voluntary dismissal of the above- captioned matter in accordance with Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(A). ECF No. 25.

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned matter is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed that judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. This means the opinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the opinion is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. Id.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.