United States Court of Federal Claims, 2021

Nolan v. United States

Nolan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided March 25, 2021
Nolan v. United States

Opinion

Sn the Gnited States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-1011C (Filed March 25, 2021) NOT FOR PUBLICATION we oe *e we we KF KF OK KK KR KR Oe Re Oe KR Ke OK OK ke * DAVID B. NOLAN, SR., * + Plaintiff, * *k Vv. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * wk ek & ee RK BF EF Kk RK K KR KR KK KF He KX KF * ORDER On August 10, 2020, plaintiff, David B. Nolan, filed a complaint in this court, seeking sick and annual leave dating from July of 1979, challenging the appointment of certain Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) judges, and requesting an investigation into certain parties for their alleged involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy. Compl. at 1-2. The government timely filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC).

Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss (Def.’s Mot.). The government contends that Mr. Nolan’s claims for sick and annual leave are precluded by the Civil Service Reform Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 1201-1206, which vests the MSPB with exclusive jurisdiction over covered employees. Def.’s Mot. at 1-2. In the alternative, defendant contends that plaintiff's pay claims are time-barred as they accrued more than six years prior to the filing of the complaint. Def.’s Mot. at 2 (citing 28 U.S.C § 2501). Regarding Mr. Nolan’s remaining claims, defendant contends they fail because none relies upon a money-mandating statute to provide a basis for our court’s jurisdiction. Def.’s Mot. at 1-3.

Plaintiff failed to file a timely (or any) response to the motion to dismiss. On February 10, 2021, the Court, in light of plaintiffs pro se status, issued an order reminding Mr. Nolan of his need to respond to the motion and ordering him to do so by March 3, 2021. Again, no response was received. Accordingly, the complaint is

DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to RCFC 41(b) for Mr. Nolan’s failure to prosecute this matter. The government’s motion to dismiss the case is DENIED- AS-MOOT. The Clerk shall close the case. bat le Vv . WOLS Senior Judge ITIS SO ORDERED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.