Greene v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1255V UNPUBLISHED

WESLEY GREENE, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: March 31, 2021 v.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Respondent. Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA) Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Naseem Kourosh, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On August 22, 2019, Wesley Greene filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered left shoulder injuries related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a Tetanus, Diphtheria and Pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine received on May 7, 2018. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 29, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that “petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for SIRVA. Specifically, petitioner’s prior left shoulder injury had apparently resolved over one year before his May 7, 2018 Tdap vaccination, and he therefore had no apparent history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of the affected shoulder prior to the vaccination that would explain the alleged signs, symptoms, examination findings, and/or diagnostic studies occurring after vaccination. Additionally, Petitioner more likely than not suffered the onset of pain within forty-eight hours of vaccination; his pain and reduced range of motion were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality has been identified that would explain his symptoms.” Id. at 7-8. Respondent further agrees that the case was timely filed; Petitioner received the Tdap vaccine in the United States; the Tdap vaccine is set forth in the Table; Petitioner’s injury lasted for at least six months; and Petitioner has not filed a prior action or received any prior compensation or award for an injury related to this vaccine. Id. Thus, Respondent agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master