Coleman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: May 7, 2021
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CLAYTON T. COLEMAN, * UNPUBLISHED
*
Petitioner, * No. 18-352V
*
v. * Special Master Dorsey
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages Award; Proffer; Influenza (“Flu”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Vaccine; Sweet’s Syndrome.
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * David A. Tierney, Rawls Law Group, Richmond, VA, for petitioner.
Sarah C. Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On March 7, 2018, Clayton T. Coleman (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Act” or “the Program”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (2012).2 Petitioner alleged that he suffered from Sweet’s syndrome and development of arthralgia as the result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination he received on February 3, 2016. Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1). On February 16, 2021, the undersigned issued a ruling finding petitioner entitled to compensation. Ruling on Entitlement dated Feb. 16, 2021 (ECF No. 54).
On May 7, 2021, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation, attached hereto as Appendix A. Respondent’s Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”) dated May 7, 2021 (ECF No. 61). In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Proffer at 1. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards: A lump sum payment of $115,674.41 in the form of a check made payable to petitioner, Clayton T. Coleman, an award comprised of $115,000.00, for pain and suffering, and $674.41 for past unreimbursable expenses.
Proffer at 2. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the Proffer.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.