United States Court of Federal Claims, 2021

Sanders v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Sanders v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided October 6, 2021 · Brian H. Corcoran
Sanders v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1153V UNPUBLISHED

HERMAN SANDERS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 31, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Influenza HUMAN SERVICES, (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Emilie Williams, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On August 8, 2019, Herman Sanders filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered right shoulder injuries related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on November 28, 2017. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed August 31, 2021, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered in the United States, he experienced the residual effects of his alleged injury for more than six months, and there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 9-11; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused the alleged shoulder injury or any other injury or condition; and denies that his current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

Nevertheless, on August 31, 2021, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A lump sum of $20,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.

Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN TIIF. U~ITF.D STA TF.S COIJRT Of FF.:DF.RAI. Cl,AI.\IS OFFICE Of SPECIAL MASl'ERS

HF:RMAI\ S.-\1\l>F.RS. ..

P~trtioner. . l\o. 19-1153V • Chief Sr>cdal Mast~r Corcornn V,

SECRETARY OF HEAi.TH A~D HUMA~ SERVICES. • ¥

* Respondent ***~********************************* STIPllLAl 'ION The p,1rtici; hereby :-tipul.uc to the followi ng mnttcri;; 1. Petitioner tih:<l a ~lition ri.>r vacdnc '°un\p~ns.-ili(m under the ~atiouaJ V~t(.'"L'inc

rct11ion seeks compcm,illion for injuric~ :allegedly rclah.:d to rctitioncr's receipt <'I' an intlucn/a

~ l fH)J fo).

-:i Petitioner n:.-ccin~J a tlu inununi✓..:,tiou on ~u,cmhc1· 18. 2017.

3. The vaccine was adm,nisll~r('d within th"~ United Swtcs -t Petitioner illlcgcs lhat he sustained a shm1l,lcr injury rch1tcd to \·acc.:inc ~dminbtrntic,n ("SIRVA..) within the cime pctfoJ set tor1h il1 the Table. H~ further allege~ that he ha~ c.,,wricnccd residual effects of his ~,tkgcd injury for more tlum six n1onths 5. Petitioner represent~ that there ha~ been no prior a\\•anl m sc1tlL•mc11l or ;.J civil action for dam.tgt~s ()11 lu:;. bch.tlf as a result of his t'ondilit)ll, 6. Resp,ondcnl dcnielt that petilion~r sustained a SIRVA Table in.1ury: cfonics that lhc- tlu va~ci11c cau:-cd the .ilkgcJ "houldcr tnJUI)' or any other injury or condition; and den ks thut his <:um.mt <:umli1i1m is u scqudac of u \'lh:cinc-rcl11tc1I injury.

7. l\faituaimng 1he1r abo\'~-stac~d posit1llns. the J>arcics neverthde:ss now at-tree that

compensation dc.scrihcd in parngr:1ph ~ <lf thil> Stipulation.

I( A~ !1-0-..)ll as prnctkablc alkr an ~ntry ofJudgment rctkctmg a ,kci:mm \;·onsi!il~11t with th~ tcnn'i of this ~1irmh1lion. uml aflcr petitioner h~,._ tiled un t•lcct1on to rcccivc <.::ompensatton pu,~u ..mt to 4] U.S.C. § JOO.:m-2 Ha}1. l ). the Sc~rctary oflkalth and Huma,1

A lump sum of $20.000.00 in the form or a died, payable lo petitioner. Thi., amount ref)rc~cnt-s ~Olllf)Cll!'>ation for all d.ama!!Cl'> that would Ix!- avaih,blc unJcr 41 U.S.C. ~ 3•.H),ta, I 5(.a).

'). As ~Hm ,ts practicuhlc after the.• entry ofjml!_,!mcnt on entitlement in this i:asc. antl after ,~tih~ni:r has tik<.I both a prnpcr and tamely dcct1011 to r~'('ci\·c C(lm1~ns.1cion tH11-s.uant to L. .S,C'. *300an-214.tl( 1l. imd an applicmion, the parties ,viii ~ubmit 10 fu11hl~r (lf(lCCl~ding'i hcforc the spci:ial master t() aw,m.l 1·i:asomihlc uthmlc) s· Ices am.I costs incu1'rctl iii ptt">t:~(•Jin~ up,on this petition.

10. Pclitioncr .,ml his atlomcy represent 1h1d .:omp,,msuti,m lo h<.• provided pun;mml It> th•~ Supul.ition is 1101 for any items or ~crv,~c:,. for whk·h the Prn~rnm lS not primanly !table under 42 U,S.C § JOOaa- 1~{ g.l. 1.0 the- c:iw:nt th.it payment has been llladc or ~an re.•somtbly bi: cxpcdc<l to he ma<l~ umlc-r iJll)' State cumpc11sution programs. iilsurnncc poli«:il!s, Fc<l~raJ or Stm~ h"·alth benefits ,,rngrnms (oth~r than ·1 itk XIX of th~· So...·1al S~curny Act (42 ll .S.C. ~ 1,,•)n ct ~L!q.)), or by ,mtitic~ 1hut provide health scNic'--s on u r~•paid husk

J I. Paymcnb niaJc pur~uant to paragraph Mand ~ny amounts aw·ard~I 1rnrsuant tu r>arngrn1lh t>ofth1:-. Stipulation will be made in acrord:mcc with 42 lt.S.l'. ~ ~00,1:t, 15( 1). !-!ollbJ(\.'t to th'-" J1vail11bility of ... uni<.:icnt st11rutory fund,;.

I, The pa11ies and the?ir auom~ys fu11hcr ag,e~ and ~tipulak' tllm. except for .rny ..,v.arJ fnr attorneys· fi:ci;, nnd litigati(\n c(1sts. and pai;t unr"imhur;nb-k c,~115~•!> , the m,.incy lll'O\.itfo<l pu1~u1.mt lo this Slif\ulatiou will b~ usctl. stllcly for the benefit of pclitiot\l.!I' as (:omcmpl.itcd by a su-ic1 ronstruccion of 42 L1.S.C. ~ JOOao , I5fa) and (d). m1d ~ubJcct to the ct>ndiliuns of 42 l:.S.C. *JOf>im-15(!,!) mHI {It 1.

J 3. In rt!curn for lh~ J>aym\!nt~ d~scrib~tl in par.1.1,!.raplu ~ and 9. 1~cit1oncr. in h,~ individlml c;1pacity .ind on hc:half ofhi!-i heirs, <.·xccutor!-, ,1dmi11istnu<.lr.,, succt·:-s(>rs or ,1si;ig11~. doc~ for~,,cr im:"m:,1hly auJ um:undilion.111)' rdca.,;c. ai.:quit and disdiargc lh~ t:nitcd St,1tc~ ar,d thl~ Sccr"~cory of I h..'ttlth and I luman Services from any .:inti .iJI actions or causes of action (ind1uling agrccrm:nls, ju1lgmcnls, daims. 1l:nm1gcs, lus.,; of scrvi~cs, expenses and all d4.•1mmds of whatever kind or 11;.m11'\!I that have b~cn brou~ht. ~oulJ have b~cn brought. or l'.oulJ be 1imcl~ brough1 m chC' Court ,,f Fcdcrnl Cf.iims. under the- N,uion,11 Vaci;inc Injury Compensation Prngr,uu. 42 U.S.C. *JOOaa-10 cl !'tC(.j., rn1 ai.:1.:ount of. ur in any Wli)' grm,,iug out ot: any a.nJ ult known ,._. ,r unknown. su-spct·tcll llf unsusr>cctcd personal ir\i:urics to or dl~ath t.)f llCtitioncr rcsultrng from. t>r alh.:gccl lu have r<:sullccl from , the 1111 \,.L&.:<.:ina1iun :tdminisll!rcil on Novcmhcr 2~.2017, ~b all~ged by p~ttlioncr in a pe1ition f<.lr vaccine comp,cnsati(ln tikd on ot about /\ugust 8. 2019. in th<: l .nitcd Stales Court <if Fcdcml Claims a~ r,ctiti(ln No, I9- I 153V, 14. If pccitimh:r should die pri<'•r to entry ofjudgmcnt. thi!-. ugrt~mcnt shall he void.~bk· upr1 11 proper nocic~ hl the Court on behalf t.lf ~11h~r or l'>oth of th"'~ ~'>iAnk~.

15. lflhc ~pedal tnaltlcr fails to i.s~uc a <.ki:ision in comrlct~ conli.)nnit)· \\•ith the tcnn:- of chis Stipulation or ,f 1hc t\mn Llf Fc"icral Ch11ms foib to enter judg.mt~m in conformity with 11 d1.'"(.·ision llmt is in complclc conformity with the te rms <lf this Stipulation. then the rartics ' settlement and th is Stipulati,ln !>hall he \.Oidabk at the ~olc d1!!-crctton of either pany .

.l (), This Stipul.ttion c~prc~:;C:-i ,l foil .md c(,mpktc ncgotiMcd scttk1ncnt of li11bili1y anJ J:.unagcs daimct! unlfcr the National Chili!houtl Vaccine: Jn_jur)' Act of l 9k(l. as amcnd~tl.

1.:xc\.'pt a:,;. otherwise no1cd in paragraph 9 ab1)Vl~. rhcr"· ,~ abM>lu{dy no agr\.'cmcnt on the p,trl or the pmtii:.,; hereto lo muki: ,tn)'' p11ymcnt or to du uny .1ct or thing olh(.•r thun is hcrcin ~xprc~-.ly stated and clearly ajlrccd to. The parties funhcr .l!!flN .u1d undcrs1and lhat lhc award dc~~nll\!d in thi::- Stipul,uion may reflect a compromise of the par1ici; ' rcspc;.'-'.'.tivc r ()!:-itions (I ~ co lmbility and.•or .imuunt (1f dama~.~s. and furlt1cr. that,, c-haugc in the nature c:,f the injm>" o r conJilion or in the: iti:ms of compcn~ation :;ought. is not grounds w motiify or revise this agreement.

I? , This Stirulation shull not h'-' ..:onsln11.!d us un a.lmis!.ion by th\.' I .lnih:cl Stat&.!s or lhc Sccrc1ary of llcalth a,1d Human Scr\'ic.:s chat pNitioner sustauicd a SIRVA Table injury: that ch~ Ou va(:t·inc" cm1l-Cd ,my cJthcr injury; or 1ha1 his ,·um.mt CtllHlition i:-" ~,,ucl.tc of n \·,1cd11c- 1·C"l:.1tcd injury.

J X, All nght:s ,ind ohhgations of petitioner hereunder shall apply equally m pc-litiom.:r· 'i h~irs. t:xcculurs. aJrninislrntrn·._, sm:ccs....or.-, :md,\,r assigns.

E:"JD Of .STIPULArJON

Respectfully submitted,

~~ L~Vl_J PETITIO~

HERMAN SANDERS

A'lTORNEY OF RECORD AUfflORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

p:;:~ OF THE ATI'ORNEY GENER.AL:

PAUL BRAZit - -Mic~?~ .

HEATIIBR L. PEARLMAN MULLE.R. BRAZIL, LLP Deputy Director Twining Road, Suite 208 Torts Branch Dresher, PA 19025 Civil Division (215) 885- 1655 U.S. Dq,artmentof!ustice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, OC 20044-0146

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR OF THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH RESPONDENT: AND HUMAN SERVICES: f ~ -q., w~ ~ Z'a& ~ < TAMARA OVERBY Z¥(Sc,,r ~ ~ Od:i-,A L EMILIE F. WILLIAMS P-e~ Acting Director, Division of htjury Trial Attorney Compensation Programs Tort:, Branch Healthcare Syst.em Bureau Civil Division Health Reso\lnleS and Services U.S. Department of Justice Administration P.O. Box 146 U.S. Department of Health Benjamin Franklin Station and Human Service.1 Washington, DC 20044-0J ,~ 5600 Fishers Lane, 08Nl46B Tel: 202-305-0124 .Rockville, MD 20857 Email: [email protected] Dated: 6 ~ / 03/1,01.,}

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.