Deutsch v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-0527V UNPUBLISHED

MICHAEL JOSEPH DEUTSCH, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: December 1, 2021 v.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On April 10, 2018, Michael Deutsch filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered shoulder pain and other symptoms that were “caused in fact by the influenza vaccination” that he received on December 1, 2016. Petition at 1-2. Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of his injury for more than six months. Petition at 2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On November 29, 2021, Respondent filed his Amended Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent stated that “[i]n light of the Chief Special Masters Findings of Fact, and medical records evidence submitted in this case, DICP has concluded that petitioner suffered a SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table”. Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that “petitioner had no recent history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of his left shoulder; the onset of pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; the pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and, no other condition or abnormality, such as brachial neuritis, has been identified to explain petitioner’s left shoulder pain.” Id. Respondent further states that petitioner suffered the residual effects of his condition for more than six months and Respondent does not dispute that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master