United States Court of Federal Claims, 2022

Bryson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided March 9, 2022 · Brian H. Corcoran

Opinion

CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0571V

(not to be published)

KENNETH BRYSON,

Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner,

v. Filed: February 7, 2022 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Special Processing Unit (SPU); HUMAN SERVICES, Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Respondent.

Mark Theodore Sadaka, Law Offices of Sadaka Associates, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for Petitioner.

Sarah Black Rifkin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On May 7, 2020, Kenneth Bryson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered left arm injuries, including Parsonage Turner Syndrome, as a result of an influenza vaccine he received on October 30, 2018. (Petition at 1). On December 21, 2021, a decision was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 41).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated January 6, 2022 (ECF No. 44), requesting a total award of $24,459.97 (representing $24,156.00 in fees and $303.97 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that he incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (ECF No. 50). Respondent reacted to the motion on January 18, 2022, indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case, but deferring resolution of the amount to be awarded at the Court’s discretion. (ECF No. 45). On January 18, 2022, Petitioner filed a reply requesting the Court grant the requested amount of fees and costs in full. (ECF No. 46). 3

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I award a total of $24,459.97 (representing $24,156.00 in fees and $303.97 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation f or the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If , upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section ref erences to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). 3 Petitioner incorrectly lists the total of attorney fees and costs requested as $24,985.07. (ECF No. 44 at 1, ECF No. 46). Billing records reflect that $24,156.00 in attorney fees and $303.97 in costs were incurred for a total requested award of $24,459.97. (ECF No. 44-1 at 17-18). 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by f iling a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.