United States Court of Federal Claims, 2022

Green v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided September 19, 2022 · Brian H. Corcoran

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-0378V UNPUBLISHED

WADE GREEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: August 15, 2022 v.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; HUMAN SERVICES, Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

Bradley S. Freedberg, Bradley S. Freedberg, P.C., for Petitioner.

Amanda Pasciuto, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On April 3, 2020, Wade Green filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”).3 Petitioner alleges that on November 9, 2018, he received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine in his left shoulder that caused his to develop left shoulder subacromial bursitis. Amended Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that his vaccine injury persisted for more than six months. Amended Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 15, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states “petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction in his left shoulder; his pain and reduced range of motion occurred within forty-eight hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; his symptoms were limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnormality was identified to explain his initial symptoms.” Id. at 8. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has met the statutory requirements by suffering his SIRVA for more than six months. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). 3 Petitioner filed an Amended Petition on November 15, 2021. ECF No. 27.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.