Ohlsen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-2058V
MICHAEL P. OHLSEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: October 31, 2023 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
Samantha Travis, Ogle Worm & Travis, LLP, Kalispell, MT, for Petitioner.
Parisa Tabassian, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On October 22, 2021, Michael Ohlsen filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that an influenza (“flu”) vaccination that he received on October 11, 2018, caused him to suffer a Table injury – Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”).
Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On April 7, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for GBS. On October 30, 2023, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $140,000.00 in pain and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $140,000.00 (for pain and suffering) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
MICHAEL P. OHLSEN, Petitioner, v. No. 21-2058V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On October 22, 2021, Michael Ohlsen (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that an influenza (“flu”) vaccination that he received on October 11, 2018, caused him to suffer Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”). Petition at 1. On April 4, 2023, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for GBS, and on April 7, 2023, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 21; ECF No. 22.
I. Items of Compensation Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $140,000.00 in pain and suffering.
See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $140,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Michael Ohlsen: $140,000.00 Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division LARA A. ENGLUND Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ PARISA TABASSIAN PARISA TABASSIAN Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-4035 Dated: October 30, 2023 [email protected] Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future, unreimbursed expenses, future lost earnings and future pain and suffering.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.