Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-0114V
STEVEN W. HOWARD, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: September 27, 2024 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, Sands Anderson, P.C., Richmond, VA, for Petitioner. Jeremy Mauritzen, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On January 26, 2024, Steven W. Howard filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, or in the alternative a caused-in-fact injury, after receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 19, 2021. Petition at 1 ¶¶ 2, 16. Petitioner also alleged that he received the flu vaccine within the United States, that he suffered the residual effects of his SIRVA for more than six months, and that neither he nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for his SIRVA, alleged as vaccine-related. Id. at ¶¶ 2, 16-17. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On September 26, 2024, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent believes “that [P]etitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 3. He adds that “based upon the record as it now stands, [P]etitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 4.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.