Stock v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: October 1, 2024
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * VICTOR STOCK as personal representative* No. 20-805V of the ESTATE OF CYNTHIA STOCK, *
*
Petitioner, * Special Master Sanders
*
v. *
*
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mark Theodore Sadaka, Law Offices of Sadaka Associates, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for Petitioner. Adam Nemeth Muffett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION1
On July 1, 2020, Victor Stock, (“Petitioner”), as personal representative of the estate of Cynthia Stock, filed a petition for compensation pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018). Petitioner alleged that the influenza (“flu”) and tetanus vaccines that Ms. Stock received November 11, 2017, and November 22, 2017, caused her to suffer from vaccine-induced polyneuropathy, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“AIDP”), Guillain-Barré syndrome, encephalopathy, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and ultimately death. Pet. at 1, ECF No. 1.
On October 1, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to Petitioner. Stipulation ¶ 7, ECF No. 77.3 Respondent “denies that the flu and/or tetanus vaccines caused Ms. Stock’s alleged GBS, or any other injury, or her death.” Id. ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation. See id. ¶ 7. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The parties stipulate that Petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
(a) A lump sum of $110,000.00, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner as legal representative of the Estate of Cynthia Stock. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
Id. ¶ 8.
I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. Accordingly, an award should be made consistent with the stipulation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.4
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Herbrina D. Sanders Herbrina D. Sanders Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.