United States Court of Federal Claims, 2024

Southworth v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Southworth v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided August 20, 2024 · Brian H. Corcoran
Southworth v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1702V

JOHN SOUTHWORTH, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: July 17, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Jay Travis Williamson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On October 2, 2023, John Southworth filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”), a Table injury, as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on November 10, 2020.

Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 15, 2024, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.

Specifically, Respondent agrees that Petitioner suffered GBS following a flu vaccine within the Table time period, and there is not a preponderance of the medical evidence Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). that Petitioner’s GBS was due to a factor unrelated to the vaccination. Id. at 6 (citing 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a)(XIV)(D), (c)(15); Section 13(a)(1). The claim also meets the statutory severity requirement because Petitioner experienced sequelae of her GBS for more than six months. Id. (citing Section 11(c)(1)(D)(i)).Therefore, based on the record as it stands, compensation is appropriate, and Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id. In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.