Dixon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-687V
STACY ANN DIXON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: July 15, 2024 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
Maximillian J. Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Madylan Yarc, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On May 9, 2023, Stacy Ann Dixon filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered a Table injury – shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as the result of her January 11, 2021 tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On April 11, 2024, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On July 12, 2024, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award.
Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
STACY ANN DIXON, Petitioner, No. 23-687V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION1 On May 9, 2023, Stacy Ann Dixon (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of a tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine on January 11, 2021. Petition at 1.
On April 5, 2024, respondent file his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, concluding that petitioner suffered a SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table, within the Table timeframe, and with no apparent alternative cause. ECF No. 19. On April 11, 2024, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation for her shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). ECF No. 21.
This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued.
I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $70,000.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below, and requests that the Chief Special Master’s damages decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2 a lump sum payment of $70,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
III. Summary of Recommended Payment Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, Stacy Ann Dixon: $70,000.00
Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
TRACI R. PATTON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Madylan L. Yarc MADYLAN L. YARC Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 [email protected] Tel.: (202) 742-6376 DATED: July 12, 2024
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.