Mathura v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-1915V
ANN MATHURA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: April 25, 2024 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Katherine Carr Esposito, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On December 21, 2020, Ann Mathura filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza vaccination she received on September 16, 2020. Petition at ¶1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On May 30, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On April 24, 2024, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $77,157.76, comprised of $75,000.00 in pain and suffering and $2,157.76 in unreimbursed out-of-pocket expenses.. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $77,157.76, comprised of $75,000.00 in pain and suffering and $2,157.76 in unreimbursed out-of-pocket expenses, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
ANN MATHURA, Petitioner, No. 20-1915V v. Chief Special Master Corcoran ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1 I. Procedural History On December 21, 2020, Ann Mathura (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to - 34, as amended. She alleges that, as a result of receiving an influenza vaccine on or about September 16, 2020, she sustained a Table Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). See Petition at 1. She alternatively alleged causation in fact and/or significant aggravation. Id. On May 19, 2023, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, concluding that petitioner suffered a SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table, within the Table timeframe, and with no apparent alternative cause. On May 30, 2023, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation for a SIRVA Table injury.
This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued.
II. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded a lump sum of $77,157.76 for all damages (consisting of $75,000.00 actual pain and suffering, and $2,157.76 in documented out-of-pocket expenses). This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
III. Form of the Award Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment, as described below, and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: A lump sum payment of $77,157.76 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.2 Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division JULIA M. COLLISON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief.
s/Katherine C. Esposito Katherine C. Esposito Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-3774 [email protected] Dated: April 24, 2024
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.