Liss v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-0837V
ANTOINETTE LISS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: April 22, 2024 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.
Alexa Roggenkamp, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On August 1, 2022, Antoinette Liss filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), a defined Table injury, resulting from the influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on October 4, 2021. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 1-4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On April 11, 2024, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On April 19, 2024, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $42,500.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $42,500.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
ANTOINETTE LISS, Petitioner, No. 22-837V Chief Special Master Corcoran v. ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On August 1, 2022, Antionette Liss (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as the result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination received on October 4, 2021.
Petition at 1.1 On April 10, 2024, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act, and on April 11, 2024, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 37; ECF No. 38.
I. Items of Compensation Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $42,500.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled
Petitioner filed an Amended Petition on September 1, 2023, that included additional detail that was not found in the original Petition but continued to allege a SIRVA injury as a result of petitioner’s October 4, 2021 flu vaccine. ECF No. 28. under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).2 Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $42,500.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division TRACI R. PATTON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Alexa Roggenkamp ALEXA ROGGENKAMP Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 (202) 616-4179 [email protected] Dated: April 19, 2024
Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.