Hintzke v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-1534V
ROBERT HINTZKE, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: March 26, 2024
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Special Processing Unit (SPU); HUMAN SERVICES, Attorney’s Fees and Costs
Respondent.
Edward Kraus, Kraus Law Group, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.
Emilie Williams, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On October 17, 2022, Robert Hintzke filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered from anaphylaxis within four hours of receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on September 3, 2020. Petition at 1. On September 28, 2023, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 26.
Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $22,878.01 (representing $22,289.20 in fees plus $588.81 in costs). Petitioner’s Final 1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).
Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed December 15, 2023, ECF No. 31. In accordance with General Order No. 9, counsel for Petitioner represents that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. Motion at 1. Respondent did not file a response to Petitioner’s Motion.
I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates. Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. Motion, at 20 - 28. Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts sought.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I award a total of $22,878.01 (representing $22,289.20 in fees plus $588.81 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s Counsel Edward Kraus. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.