McGinnis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-0199V
JAMES MCGINNIS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: March 20, 2024 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.
Camille Jordan Webster, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On February 13, 2023, James McGinnis filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as the result of the tetanus (“Tdap”) vaccination received on January 20, 2022. Petition at 1. at ¶¶ 1, 8. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On March 8, 2024, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for his SIRVA. On March 20, 2024, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $47,601.81, representing compensation in the amounts of $47,500.00 for pain and suffering and Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $47,601.81, representing compensation in the amounts of $47,500.00 for pain and suffering and $101.81 for actual unreimbursable expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) JAMES MCGINNIS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 23-199V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On February 13, 2023, James McGinnis (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation (“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended (the “Vaccine Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34. Petitioner alleges that he received a tetanus vaccination on January 20, 2022, and thereafter suffered from a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1.
On March 8, 2024, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a SIRVA Table injury, and on that same day, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 18; ECF No. 20.
I. Items of Compensation A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $47,500 in pain and suffering. See U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that he incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $101.81. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B).
Petitioner agrees.
These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $47,601.81, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
III. Summary of Recommended Payment Following Judgment Lump sum payable to petitioner, James McGinnis: $47,601.81
Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division LARA A. ENGLUND Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/CAMILLE J. WEBSTER CAMILLE J. WEBSTER Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Direct dial: (202) 307-3241 Email: [email protected] Dated: March 20, 2024
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.