United States Court of Federal Claims, 2024

Mason v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Mason v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided February 5, 2024 · Brian H. Corcoran
Mason v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0871V

MICHELLE MASON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 3, 2024 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Leigh Finfer, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Lauren Kells, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On February 4, 2021, Michelle Mason filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an influenza vaccination she received on October 7, 2020. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 7, 2023, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On January 2, 2024, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $75,000.00 in pain and suffering plus $242.01 to satisfy a Medicaid lien. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner the following: • A lump sum payment of $75,000.00 for pain and suffering in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and • A lump sum payment of $242.01, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Florida Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Humana Subrogation & Other Third-Party Liability 004/48120, Event No. 8839310-8846841, P.O. Box 2257, Louisville, KY 40201.

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ) MICHELLE MASON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 21-871V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On August 2, 2023, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that petitioner suffered an injury that is compensable under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34, that is, a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table. ECF No. 25. Accordingly, on August 7, 2023, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement. ECF No. 27.

I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items A. Pain and Suffering Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded a lump sum of $75,000.00 for pain and suffering, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

Petitioner agrees.

B. Medicaid Lien Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Florida Medicaid lien, as administered by Humana, in the amount of $242.01, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Florida, as administered by Humana, may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Florida has made to or on behalf of petitioner from the date of her eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of her alleged vaccine-related injury suffered on or about October 7, 2020 under Title XIX of the Social Security Act.

The above amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through two lump sum payments described below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 1 A. A lump sum payment of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and B. A lump sum payment of $242.01, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Florida Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and: Humana Subrogation & Other Third-Party Liability 004/48120 Event No. 8839310-8846841 P.O. Box 2257 Louisville, KY 40201 Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to Humana for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.

C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division DARRYL R. WISHARD Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Lauren Kells LAUREN KELLS Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-4187 Email: [email protected] DATED: January 2, 2024

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.