Hargens v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-672V UNPUBLISHED
FRANCINE HARGENS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: January 4, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
Jonathan J. Svitak, Shannon Law Group, P.C., Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner.
Heather L. Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION1 On May 5, 2023, Francine Hargens filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury from an influenza vaccine she received on October 13, 2021. ECF No. 1.
On January 3, 2024, Petitioner filed a motion for a decision dismissing the petition. ECF No. 9. For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED.
Relevant Procedural History Petitioner did not file any supporting documentation with the petition. The PAR Initial Order required Petitioner to file statutorily required supporting evidence. ECF No. 5. Petitioner did not subsequently file any supporting documentation.
On January 3, 2024, Petitioner filed a motion for a decision dismissing the petition stating that “[a]n investigation of the facts and science supporting her case has
Grounds for Dismissal To receive compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a petitioner must prove either 1) that the vaccinee suffered an “on-Table” injury – i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table – corresponding to one of the listed vaccines within the applicable time frames, or 2) that the vaccinee suffered an injury not listed the Table or outside the applicable time frames, an “off-Table” injury, that was actually caused by a listed vaccine. See §§ 300aa—13(a)(1)(A) and 11(c)(1).
Petitioner alleged an on-Table claim, i.e., that his shoulder injury was caused by the influenza vaccination.
Petitioner has not filed any supporting documentation as required by the Vaccine Act, § 11(c). Moreover, Petitioner admitted that she will not be able to establish that she is entitled to compensation in the Vaccine Program.
Thus, Petitioner has failed to establish entitlement to compensation in the Vaccine Program. This case is dismissed for insufficient proof. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.