Rivera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1644V
KRISTENA RIVERA, parent and Chief Special Master Corcoran natural guardian of L.R., a minor,
Filed: October 10, 2024 Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Emily Hanson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
On September 25, 2023, Kristena Rivera, on behalf of her minor child, L.R., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that L.R. suffered from intussusception following a rotavirus vaccination received on December 1, 2022. Petition at ¶ 1. Petitioner further alleges that L.R.’s intussusception required surgery. Petition at ¶ 4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On October 7, 2024, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent states that “Petitioner is entitled to a presumption of causation because L.R.’s intussusception meets the criteria of the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, L.R.’s intussusception manifested between one and twenty-one days after her receipt of the rotavirus vaccine, and there is not preponderant evidence that her condition was due to a factor unrelated to the vaccine.” Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that “L.R.’s intussusception resulted in inpatient hospitalization and surgical intervention.” Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.