Lowery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0940V

JEANNIE LOWERY, Petitioner, Chief Special Master Corcoran v. Filed: January 27, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Pint Litigation, Greensboro, NC, for Petitioner.

Jamica Marie Littles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS1 On February 17, 2021, Jeannie Lowery filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following administration of an influenza vaccine that she received on September 11, 2020. Petition at 1-3. On October 18, 2024, I issued a decision awarding damages to Petitioner, based on Respondent’s proffer. ECF No. 45.

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $15,898.80 (representing $15,324.00 for fees and $574.80 for costs). Petitioner’s Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Application for Attorneys’ Fees, filed Nov. 26, 2024, ECF No. 50; ECF No. 50-1 at 12. In accordance with General Order No. 9, counsel for Petitioner represents that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. ECF No 50-2. Respondent did not file a response.

The rates requested for work performed through the end of 2024 are reasonable and consistent with our prior determinations, and will therefore be adopted.

I also note this case required additional briefing regarding the issue of situs. See Petitioner’s Motion for Factual Ruling Regarding the Site of Vaccine Administration and Supporting Memorandum of Law, filed Apr. 26, 2023, ECF No. 29; Petitioner’s Reply to Respondent’s Response to Motion for Factual Ruling Regarding the Site of Vaccine Administration, filed June 2, 2023, ECF No. 31. Petitioner’s counsel expended approximately 7.7 hours drafting the motion and 1.2 hours drafting the reply, for a combined total of 8.9 hours. ECF No. 50-1 at 7-8. I find this time to have been reasonably incurred. (And all time billed to the matter was also reasonably incurred.)

Furthermore, Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs, ECF No. 50-1 at 12-24. And Respondent offered no specific objection to the rates or amounts sought. I have reviewed the requested costs and find them to be reasonable.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). I award a total of $15,898.80 (representing $15,324.00 for fees and $574.80 for costs) to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this Decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.