Luu v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1084V UNPUBLISHED
JOHN LUU,
Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner,
v. Filed: March 28, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Jonathan J. Svitak, Shannon Law Group, P.C., Woodridge, IL, for Petitioner. Heather L. Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION1 On July 17, 2023, John Luu filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury from a tetanus- diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine he received on June 16, 2022. ECF No. 1.
On March 25, 2025, Petitioner filed a motion for a decision dismissing the petition. ECF No. 14. For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED.
Relevant Procedural History Petitioner did not file any supporting documentation with the petition. The PAR Initial Order required Petitioner to file additional statutorily required documents. ECF No. 5. Petitioner did not subsequently file any supporting documentation.
On March 25, 2025, Petitioner filed a motion for a decision dismissing the petition stating that “[a]n investigation of the facts and science supporting his case has demonstrated to petitioner that he will be unable to prove that he is entitled to compensation in the Vaccine Program.” ECF No. 14 at 1. Petitioner understands that dismissal of his petition would result in a judgment against him and end all his rights in the Vaccine Program. Id. at 2.
Grounds for Dismissal To receive compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a petitioner must prove either 1) that the vaccinee suffered an “on-Table” injury – i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table – corresponding to one of the listed vaccines within the applicable time frames, or 2) that the vaccinee suffered an injury not listed the Table or outside the applicable time frames, an “off-Table” injury, that was actually caused by a listed vaccine. See §§ 300aa—13(a)(1)(A) and 11(c)(1). Here, Petitioner alleged an on-Table claim, i.e., that his shoulder injury was caused by the Tdap vaccination.
Petitioner has not filed any medical records in support of his vaccine injury. Moreover, in the motion for decision, Petitioner stated that he would not be able to prove entitlement to compensation in the Vaccine Program.
Thus, Petitioner has failed to establish entitlement to compensation in the Vaccine Program. This case is dismissed for insufficient proof. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.