Horvat v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-0430V
SARAH HORVAT, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: April 4, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.
Benjamin Rex Eisenberg, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On March 20, 2024, Sarah Horvat filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from an influenza vaccine received on September 27, 2021. Petition at 21. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On November 20, 2024, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On April 4, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $144,000.00. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $144,000.00 (in pain and suffering), to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
SARAH HORVAT, Petitioner, v. No. 24-0430V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On March 20, 2024, Sarah Horvat (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, 42 C.F.R. § 100.3, as the result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination received on September 27, 2021. Petition at 2.
On November 18, 2024, respondent filed respondent’s report conceding entitlement to compensation, and the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF Nos. 18 and 19. On April 3, 2024, petitioner accepted respondent’s proffer of compensation. Although respondent submits this filing, petitioner has reviewed and agrees with this filing.
I. Compensation Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $144,000.00 in pain and suffering.
See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: a lump sum payment of $144,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. 1 Respectfully submitted, YAAKOV M. ROTH Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VORIS E. JOHNSON, JR. Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Benjamin Eisenberg BENJAMIN EISENBERG Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington D.C. 20044-0146 (202) 514-4074 [email protected] DATED: Friday, April 4, 2025
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future, unreimbursed expenses, future lost earnings and future pain and suffering.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.