United States Court of Federal Claims, 2025

Matilsky v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Matilsky v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided July 16, 2025 · Brian H. Corcoran
Matilsky v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-0269V

DARI MATILSKY, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: June 16, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Jessica E. Choper, Britcher Leone & Sergio, L.L.C., Glen Rock, NJ, for Petitioner.

Sara DeStefano, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1 On February 23, 2023, Dari Matilsky filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered the Vaccine Injury Table of Guillain- Barré syndrome (“GBS”) that developed following an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on February 27, 2020. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 13, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that Petitioner’s claim satisfies the Table criteria for GBS following receipt of a seasonal flu vaccine. Id. at 5 (citing 42 C.F.R. §§

1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

100.3(a)(XIV)(D), (c)(15). Respondent also agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. Id. (internal citations omitted).

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.