Wells v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-0450V

TESSA WELLS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 5, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Catherine Wallace Costigan, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Margaret Armstrong, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On March 25, 2024, Tessa Wells filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), or in the alternative that she suffered injuries caused or significantly aggravated, as a result of both the flu and HPV vaccines she received on November 18, 2022. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at August 4, 2025, ¶¶ 1-4. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of the alleged injury for more than six months. Petition at 6; Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu and/or HPV vaccines caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; denies that the flu and/or HPV vaccines significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury, or any of petitioner’s pre-existing conditions; and denies that the flu and/or HPV vaccines caused petitioner’s current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Nevertheless, on August 4, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation: A. A lump sum of $25,000.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner; and B. A lump sum of $624.89, representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to Petitioner by the State of Colorado, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Optum: Optum Attn: Team 2 Ref: Tessa Wellsmartin, Optum Event No. 136835913 PO Box 182643 Columbus, OH 43218-2643 Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to Optum. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id. I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.