Spencer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1968V
ELLERY SPENCER, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: September 12, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Jessica Wallace, Siri & Glimstad, LLP, Aventura, FL, for Petitioner.
Dima Atiya, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1
On December 2, 2024, Ellery Spencer filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from anaphylaxis following an influenza vaccination she received on December 1, 2021. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that she has suffered “sequela that has continued for more than six (6) months.” Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On September 11, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent states that “Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”), which afford Petitioner a presumption of causation if onset of anaphylaxis occurs within four hours of vaccination”. Id. at 9. Respondent further agrees that “based on the record as it now stands, Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.