United States Court of Federal Claims, 2025

Lipka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided December 9, 2025 · Brian H. Corcoran

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-0769V

VICKI LIPKA, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: October 31, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Nathan Joseph Marchese, Siri & Glimstad, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner. Nathaniel Trager, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On May 5, 2025, Vicki Lipka filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) following an influenza vaccination she received on October 14, 2023. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of her vaccine-related injury for more than six months. Petition at ¶ 41. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 29, 2025, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Table and Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”), which afford a petitioner a presumption of causation if the onset of GBS occurs between three and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no apparent alternative cause.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act.” Id. at 1.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

1 Because this Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.