United States Court of Federal Claims, 2025

Trollop v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided December 10, 2025 · Thomas L. Gowen

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: October 29, 2025 * * * * * * * * * * * * * LANCE TROLLOP *

Petitioner, * No. 22-278V

v. * Special Master Gowen

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * Joseph A. Vuckovich, Mctlaw, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Ryan D. Pyles, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION ON STIPULATION1 On March 11, 2022, Lance Trollop (“petitioner”) filed his claim for compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving an influenza vaccination on November 5, 2019, he suffered Bell’s palsy. Id. at Preamble.

On October 29, 2025, respondent filed a stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 48). Respondent denies that the flu vaccine petitioner received caused him to develop Bell’s Palsy or any other injury, or his current condition. Id. at ¶ 6. Maintaining their respective positions, the parties nevertheless, now agree that the issues between them settled and that a decision should be entered awarding petitioner compensation in accordance with the stipulation attached hereto as Appendix A. Id. at ¶ 7.

The stipulation provides:

1) A lump sum payment of $145,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. This amount represents all compensation for damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the flu vaccine.

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

1 Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it to a publicly available website. This decision will appear at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc or on the Court of Federal Claims website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the decision is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the decision will be posted on the court’s website without any changes. Id. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa. 3 Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.