Sadaka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-790V Filed: August 15, 2024 UNPUBLISHED

MARK SADAKA, as Independent Administrator to Collect, of the Estate Special Master Horner of JAQUELINE STOKES, Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Mark Theodore Sadaka, Law Offices of Sadaka Associates, Englewood, NJ, for petitioner.

Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1 On June 29, 2020, the decedent petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. (2012), 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner alleged that she left arm paresthesia following vaccination. (Id.) On May 9, 2023, the undersigned issued a decision dismissing this case after petitioner had died and no estate representative was substituted as petitioner. (ECF No. 43.) On November 17, 2023, petitioner’s counsel was substituted as petitioner in his capacity as an independent administrator to collect of the estate of the former petitioner. (ECF No. 52.) Petitioner, Mr. Sadaka, then filed a final motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF No. 53.) Petitioner requests a total of Because this document contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the document will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

Within this decision, all citations to § 300aa will be the relevant sections of the Vaccine Act at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq. $35,140.69 for attorneys’ fees and costs, including $30,497.30 for attorneys’ fees and $4,643.39 for costs. 3 (ECF No. 53-1.)

On December 15, 2023, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion. (ECF No. 54.) Respondent argues that “[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13 requires respondent to file a response to a request by petitioner for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.” Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that he “is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case.”

Id. at 2. Respondent requests that the court exercise its discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees and costs. Id. at 3.

The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s request. (ECF No 53-1, 53-2.) In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates.

The requested costs are sufficiently documented and are reasonable.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. § 300aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned GRANTS petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $35,140.69 4 as a lump sum in the form of a check payable to Mr. Sadaka, the Independent Administrator to Collect, of the Estate of Jaqueline Stokes, and Attorney Mark Sadaka, counsel of record for petitioner.

The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Daniel Horner Daniel Horner Special Master

In the body of the motion petitioner states the total is $34,140.69 for attorneys’ fees and costs; however, based on my review of the supporting documentation, the correct total is $35, 140.69.

This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, including “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991).

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.