United States Court of Federal Claims, 2025

Richardson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Richardson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided December 31, 2025 · Brian H. Corcoran
Richardson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-0665V

SYLVIA RICHARDSON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: November 24, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1 On April 17, 2025, Sylvia Richardson filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges That a September 18, 2024 influenza (“flu”) vaccination caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 25, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. On November 21, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded a total of $62,500.00, in pain and suffering. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $62,500.00, in pain and suffering, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ___________________________________ ) SYLVIA RICHARDSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 25-665V ) Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________) RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION On April 17, 2025, Sylvia Richardson (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Act”), alleging that a September 18, 2024 influenza vaccine caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table. Petition at 1. On August 22, 2025, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report recommending compensation under the terms of the Act. ECF No. 13. On August 25, 2025, the Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation.

ECF No. 14. Respondent proposes the following proffer on award of compensation.

I. Items of Compensation Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $62,500.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respondent recommends that the Court’s decision and judgment award compensation as a lump sum payment of $62,500.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner, Sylvia Richardson.1 Respectfully submitted, BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division JULIA M. COLLISON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/ Rachelle P. Bishop RACHELLE P. BISHOP Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 (202) 616-3662 [email protected] Dated: November 21, 2025

1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future unreimbursed expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.