United States Court of Federal Claims, 2026

Arzate v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided January 29, 2026 · Christian J. Moran

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS *************************

CANDY FLORES ARZATE, * No. 22-842V * *

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * * Filed: December 30, 2025 SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * *

Respondent. * *************************

Steven Zaloudek, Maney & Gordon, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Petitioner; Dorian Hurley, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On December 29, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Candy Flores Arzate on August 2, 2022. Petitioner alleged that the tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) and measles, mumps, and rubella (“MMR”) vaccines she received on January 18, 2021, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused Ms. Arzate to suffer from bilateral leg weakness, post-immunization paresthesia, and Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”). Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on Ms. Arzate’s behalf as a result of Ms. Arzate’s condition.

Respondent denies that Ms. Arzate’s Tdap and MMR vaccinations caused Ms. Arzate’s bilateral leg weakness, post-immunization paresthesia, and GBS, or any other injury, and denies that Ms. Arzate’s current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum of $31,000.00 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted on the website. 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.