Haimer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1805V

DARREN HAIMER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: January 28, 2026

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

Alison Haskins, Siri & Glimstad, LLP, Aventura, FL, for Petitioner.

Mary Eileen Holmes, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On November 4, 2024, Darren Haimer filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration. Petition, ECF No. 1. On June 2, 2025, I issued a decision awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. ECF No. 15.

1Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, requesting an award of $27,119.24 (representing $26,286.40 in fees plus $832.84 in costs). Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Motion”) filed June 23, 2025, ECF No. 19. Furthermore, Petitioner filed a signed statement representing that no personal out-of-pocket expenses were incurred. ECF No. 19-4.

Respondent reacted to the motion on July 7, 2025, indicating that he is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case but defers resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. ECF No. 20 at 2-5.

Respondent also indicated that Petitioner seeks fees that exceed the damages awarded herein. Id. at 4. Petitioner filed a reply, stating that “Petitioner provided sufficient and complete evidence herein on the reasonableness of his requested fees and costs.” ECF No. 22 at 5.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request and I find no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates. But Counsel must ensure not to bill sums to a matter where the disparity between time expended by counsel and the Petitioner’s award is so readily evident. Additionally, I have reviewed the requested costs. Petitioner has provided supporting documentation for all claimed costs. ECF No. 19-3. I find the amount of costs incurred herein to be reasonable and hereby award them in full.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs for successful claimants. Section 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. Petitioner is awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the total amount of $27,119.24 (representing $26,286.40 in fees plus $832.84 in costs) to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.