United States Court of Federal Claims, 2026

Huhn-Seto v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided March 30, 2026 · Herbrina D S Young

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: March 4, 2026

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SHAWNA HUHN-SETO, *

Petitioner, * No. 23-1880V

v. * Special Master Young

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Edward Kraus, Kraus Law Group, LLC, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.

Debra A. Filteau Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DISMISSAL DECISION 1

On October 25, 2023, Shawna Huhn-Seto (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 2 Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleged that the administration of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 18, 2020, caused her to suffer from anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and significantly aggravated her pre-existing migraine condition. Id.

On March 2, 2026, Petitioner filed an unopposed motion for a decision dismissing her petition. ECF No. 28. Petitioner acknowledged judgment will result against her and will end her rights in the Vaccine Program. Id. at 1. Petitioner further acknowledged that her attorney may file for attorneys’ fees and costs following the dismissal of her case. Id. She also stated her intent to preserve her right to file a civil action in the future pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(2). Id. at 2.

To receive compensation under the Program, Petitioner must prove either (1) that she suffered a “Table Injury”—i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table—corresponding to the vaccination, or (2) that she suffered an injury that was caused by a vaccine. See §§ 13(a)(1)(A), 11(c)(1). An examination of the record did not uncover any evidence that Petitioner suffered a “Table Injury.” Further, the record does not contain persuasive evidence that Petitioner’s alleged injury was caused by the flu vaccine.

Under the Act, petitioners may not be given a Program award based solely on their claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by medical records or the opinion of a competent physician. § 13(a)(1). In this case, the medical records are insufficient to prove Petitioner’s claim, and Petitioner has not filed a supportive opinion from an expert witness. Therefore, this case must be dismissed for insufficient proof. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Herbrina D. S. Young Herbrina D. S. Young Special Master

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 The Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa- 10 et seq. (hereinafter “Vaccine Act,” “the Act,” or “the Program”). Hereafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.