Green v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-0753V
SUSAN GREEN, as Executor of Chief Special Master Corcoran ESTATE OF JACK BENMAYOR,
Filed: March 10, 2026 Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.
Ryan Daniel Pyles, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
On May 1, 2025, Susan Green, as Executor of the Estate of Jack Benmayor, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that Mr. Benmayor suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”), resulting in his death, caused by an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on October 13, 2023. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that Mr. Benmayor received the vaccine in the United States, that his death was caused by his GBS and complications thereof, which were caused by the flu vaccine, and neither Mr. Benmayor nor his estate has ever received any compensation in the form of an award or settlement for his vaccine-related injuries. Petition at ¶¶ 5, 20, 21. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On March 9, 2026, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table and Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation, which afford a presumption of causation if the onset of GBS occurs between three and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no apparent alternative cause. Id. at 6. Respondent further agrees that the statutory severity requirement is satisfied, as Mr. Benmayor more likely than not died as a result of his presumptive GBS. Id. Therefore, Respondent agrees that Petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.
In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.