United States Court of Federal Claims, 2026

Yang v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Yang v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Decided July 7, 2026 · Brian H. Corcoran
Yang v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 25-731V

XIAO YANG, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: May 26, 2026 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jessica Olins, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner. Madelyn Weeks, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On April 28, 2025, Xiao Yang filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination administered to her on November 11, 2022. Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was received in the United States, she suffered sequela of her injury for more than six months, and neither Petitioner nor any other party has ever received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine-related injury. Id. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 24, 2026, a Ruling on Entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her GBS. ECF No. 23. On May 22, 2026, Respondent filed a Proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $172,100.00 in pain and suffering, $489.82 in past unreimbursable expenses, and $18,162.35 to satisfy a State of Washington Medicaid lien. Proffer at 2, ECF No. 25. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. See id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner the following:

A. A lump sum payment of $172,589.82 for pain and suffering and past unreimbursable expenses to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner; and

B. A lump sum payment of $18,162.35, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Washington Medicaid lien, to be pain through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to:

Health Care Authority Casualty Unit P.O. Box 45561 Olympia, WA 98504-5561 File #241978

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

XIAO YANG,

Petitioner, No. 25-731V

Chief Special Master Corcoran v. ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION 1

On April 28, 2025, Xiao Yang (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that she suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”), as defined in the Vaccine Injury Table, following receipt of an influenza vaccine on November 11, 2022. Petition at 1. On April 20, 2026, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“respondent”) filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act for a GBS Table injury. ECF No. 21. On the same day, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation. ECF No. 23. I. Items of Compensation

Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded the following:

A. Pain and Suffering Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $172,100.00 in pain and suffering. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $489.82. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.

C. Medicaid Lien Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy the State of Washington Medicaid lien in the amount of $18,162.35, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Washington may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the State of Washington has made to or on behalf of petitioner from the date of her eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of her vaccine-related injury suffered on or about November 11, 2022, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act.

The above amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award/Recommended Payments

The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through two lump sum payments described below, and request that the Chief Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2

A. A lump sum payment of $172,589.82 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner, Xiao Yang; and

B. A lump sum payment of $18,162.35, representing compensation for satisfaction of the

State of Washington Medicaid lien, to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to:

Health Care Authority Casualty Unit PO Box 45561 Olympia, WA 98504-5561 File #241978

Petitioner is a competent adult. Proof of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted, BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General JONATHAN D. GUYNN Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VORIS E. JOHNSON, JR. Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ MADELYN E. WEEKS MADELYN E. WEEKS Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 451-7312 Email: [email protected] DATED: May 22, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that today, May 22, 2026, a copy of the foregoing pleading will be served by electronic mail to Jessica Olins at [email protected]. s/ MADELYN E. WEEKS MADELYN E. WEEKS

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). 1 This Proffer does not include attorneys’ fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued. 2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.